Archive for December, 2008

30
Dec

He’s Still a Politician But …

… then again, a broken clock is right twice a day. Democrat Republican senator from Kentucky and Major League Hall of Famer Jim Bunning was recently uninvited to the Detroit sports card show after voting ‘no’ to an auto industry bailout.

PLAYING FIELD TO POLITICS

The Gibraltar Trade Center has canceled an appearance by former Detroit Tigers pitcher Jim Bunning at a weekend sports card show after the Kentucky congressman voted against the loan package Thursday night to help Detroit’s auto companies.

Bunning is a former Hall of Famer who was a popular draw at the shows. He was set to sell autographs this weekend at the center on Eureka Road in Taylor….

Robert Koester said his father’s decision to drop Bunning came within 20 minutes of discovering how he voted on the bailout package.

29
Dec

UAW-ism, or Why Federally-Backed Unions Are Destroying Detroit, and Us All

NOTE: No Oiler In This Diagram
NOTE: I Don’t See An  Oiler In This Diagram

Lew Rockwell had a great post this morning (with video goodness!) about “Little Three” union officials slacking off and engaging in personal “business” (shopping, beer-buying) while on the clock. I wrote and related this story to Lew;

Hi Lew,

It is amazing to see a news organization, particularly one in a “union town” covering this story, since such abuses are longstanding and widespread. But there is nothing unique about what the two union reps in the story are accused of.

In 1993 – 1994, I was the safety and health manager of a large construction project ($280M) at a major oil refinery. Being a union plant, of course all of the contractors on the project were forced to hire union “labor” to do all tasks, including some that in a free market would not be done.

Before any work could commence, the contractors on the project had to sign a “project labor agreement”, or PLA, which set forth staffing requirements, work rules, and union jurisdiction. The number of unions involved in the endeavor was mind-boggling. We had carpenters, cement finishers, dockbuilders, electricians, laborers, millwrights, pipefitters, plumbers, teamsters, operating engineers, and one or two others I am sure I am forgetting.

Because the refinery was under a state-imposed environmental compliance deadline for completion, the project ran 2 12-hour shifts per day, 7 days per week to try to meet the deadline. Such mandates and deadlines always present tremendous opportunities for graft. I’ll spare you the details, except at one point the civil contractor was paying a “pipefitter” to make sandwiches for sale to the project personnel, which at 300 – plus workers undoubtedly handsomely enhanced his own personal profit.

Some of the unions even had subgroups, such as one class of operating engineers that ran pumps and generators up to a certain size, others that operated smaller loaders and excavators, another class of operators that ran larger excavators, and finally the “top” class of operating engineers, the crane operators.

The operating engineers’ contract at the time required that all equipment over a certain (arbitrary, low) horsepower be staffed by an operating engineer and an oiler, whether the maintenance regime for the equipment required continuous hand-oiling or not. I will leave it to you to ponder whether modern machinery made in the last 50 years would have such an intense need for maintenance.

Because this requirement undoubtedly caused many objections, an alternate “compliance” method was for the contractor to pay the operating engineer an extra hour for “grease time” (how apt), ostensibly to compensate the operating engineer for coming in an hour early to maintain and prepare his equipment for the start of the shift.

Except, remember, the project operated on 2 12-hour shifts, 7 days per week, which meant that during “grease time” the equipment was still being used by the operator on the previous shift. So we in essence have two operating engineers being paid to work 13 hours per day each, for a total of 26 hours of labor pay per qualifying machine per day.

It gets better. In the construction trades, the union representative is paid a little more than the highest-paid worker on the project. Because of the size of the crew, the project labor agreement mandated that the operating engineers have two project-paid union representatives, a “shop steward”, and a “master mechanic”, who were each paid “grease time’ also.

I’m not entirely sure what the duties of a “shop steward” are, but since the project already had 3 or 4 actual full-time mechanics, the “master mechanic” had few if any remaining visible duties. If you were lucky, you could get hold of him over the project radio system 3 to 4 hours per day at best. Allegedly one would have had better luck looking for him on the golf course most days, weather permitting. Yet because his position was mandated by the PLA, he was being paid 26 hours per day, 7 days per week.

After about 6-8 months of this, it became so embarrassing that the union itself actually put a stop to it, assigning a second-shift “master mechanic”, an extremely able, competent, and hard-working operating engineer who performed all of his union “duties” and operated equipment as well. But this was only one small instance of union abuse on the project.

Somewhere in this sorry tale I should mention that the construction ‘managers’ for the project were Kellogg, Brown, and Root (nee Brown and Root Braun), a particularly ill-named group of losers and no-accounts who actually impeded safety and progress on the project during their tenure.

Please use my alias if you print this.

UPDATE: This was funny.

25
Dec

Disappearing Civil Liberties Mug

My Christmas present from Cathy. Just add hot stuff and the Bill of Rights disappears!

24
Dec

Dan Rather Exposes The Government – Corporate Media Complex

We have not been fans in the past of corporate “journalists” like former CBS News anchor Dan Rather, understanding implicitly that their privileged positions compromise their fundamental integrity.

So my eyes goggled at hearing Rather, the archetypal corporate anchor saying this on NPR yesterday morning;

“…connections, most of them secret connections, between huge international corporate conglomerates and Washington power, whether it be in the hands of Democrats or Republicans, and its influence on what news Americans get”.

You will recall that Rather was shitcanned from CBS News after he ran a story critical of G.W. Bush’s “military service” that centered around documents that conservative pundits claimed, without any evidence were forgeries. Rather was fired even though, according to this same NPR story, the forgery charges remain unproven.

Still, it is gratifying to hear, straight from the mouth of a former insider that the major news outlets in this country are wholly owned by the powers that be.

It confirms the soundness of our view that our 200+ year old Republican experiment is indeed at an end, and needs to be redeemed or abolished, in order that the blessings of Liberty may return.

24
Dec

The Right Way To Think About Corporate Media

SNL Isn't So Funny Now, Is It?

"Friends" Isn't So Funny Now, Is It?

Some friends and I were just discussing this – we all agreed that the proper way to think about NBC, MSNBC,  CNBC, or anything else connected to General Electric is that it should generally be treated as if it were being beamed to earth from the Death Star;

“The Death Star was the code name of an unspeakably powerful and horrific weapon developed by the Empire. The immense space station carried a weapon capable of destroying entire planets. The Death Star was to be an instrument of terror, meant to cow treasonous worlds with the threat of annihilation. While the massive station is evidence of the evil that was the Galactic Empire, it was also proof of the New Order’s greatest weakness — the belief that technology and terror were superior to the will of oppressed beings fighting for freedom.”

Also see this hilarious “Schoolhouse Rock” -style parody about corporate media;

Conspiracy Theory Rock

16
Dec

The Blues Are Timeless (WPA Blues, that is)

From Dan Glovak on the Lewrockwell.com blog comes this ageless nugget of wisdom about government;
WPA Blues – Casey Bill Weldon

16
Dec

Formaldehyde In Temporary Housing Units – UPDATE

Update of a story we ran in early 2007;

Mike Tennant had http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/014209.html this post on the lewrockwell.com blog about this article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/19/AR2007071901039_pf.html on high levels of formaldehyde in the mobile homes FEMA used to provide temporary housing to the victims of Hurricanes Rita and Katrina. Being an environmental health professional, I had to set the record straight, and so wrote him a note;
Hi Mike,
I am a Certified Industrial Hygienist, working for a laboratory that tests air samples for formaldehyde, among other substances. I cannot speak directly about any knowledge I may or may not have about air samples that my laboratory may or may not have tested. However, I can shed some light on this situation

The OSHA www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_242600.html Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) for formaldehyde is 0.75 parts per million (ppm) in air. Presumably, the limit referred to in the article is the NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) of 0.016 ppm.

Seventy-five times that is 1.2 ppm. In my opinion, this number is probably less than half of the actual concentrations to which the residents were exposed, given the time elapsed since the trailers were put into use, and the political realities involved.

The OSHA PEL is based on acute symptoms of formaldehyde exposure, such as irritation. But in addition to being a sensitizer and a severe eye and respiratory irritant, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has determined that there is www.iarc.fr/ENG/Press_Releases/archives/pr153a.html “sufficient evidence” that occupational exposure to formaldehyde causes nasopharyngial cancer.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), after moving into a new building complex in Research Triangle Park, found that high levels of formaldehyde and other chemicals coming from building materials made the offices uninhabitable. They subsequently revised their general building specifications, to the effect that the EPA will not accept (or pay for) any building where formaldehyde levels exceed the National Institute Of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Level (REL) of 0.016 ppm (20 micrograms per cubic meter). UPDATE: Recently, FEMA itself has adopted this standard too, for temporary housing units purchased by the agency for future disasters http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2008/04/11/fema_limits_formaldehyde_in_trailers/

The EPA has not, however, created a similar enforceable standard for non-EPA employees. Nor, apparently, is there any concern within the government over this serious hazard, as evinced by the fact that FEMA is as of this writing, selling the evacuated trailers to the unsuspecting public; http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17509045/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/17/AR2008011702965.html

Given the fact that the very poorest of homebuyers is the likely market for these hastily-built, environmentally-challenged trailers, I think we have another illustration of exactly how well the federal government cares for the poor.

Most mobile homes, and indeed most new homes in general contain significant amounts of engineered wood products such as oriented strand board (OSB), which are various wood-waste products bound together with either a urea-formaldehyde http://www.pacia.org.au/_uploaditems/docs/3.urea_formaldehyde_resin.pdf or a http://gp.com/chemical/products.asp?RC=1&KW=&BS=68%7COriented%20Strand%20Board&DC=3%7CWood%20Adhesives phenol / formaldehyde resin.

Properly manufactured, mixed, and cured, the phenol-formaldehyde resin product (often designated as exterior-grade) product yields modest amounts of formaldehyde into living spaces where it is used in construction, and this amount usually tapers off over time.

However, the urea – formaldehyde resin products can off-gas significant amounts of formaldehyde under normal conditions. If the product isn’t manufactured properly, the amounts of formaldehyde that off-gas can be substantial. This behavior is exacerbated by high-temperature, high-humidity conditions, such as found in coastal Mississippi and the bayous of Louisiana.

12
Dec

Is This Guy Stupid or Just a Neo-Con Cheerleader?

Perhaps he’s both. I was just scanning through the latest entries at Audible.com and stumbled across this little gem, Empires of Trust by Thomas F Madden. Check the synopsis. I expected to see "Published by The Onion.com" after it.

t4_image

By making friends of enemies and demonstrating a commitment to fairness, the two republics – both "reluctant" yet unquestioned super-powers – built empires based on trust. Madden also includes vital lessons from the Roman Republic’s 100-year struggle with "terrorism."

11
Dec

Cargo Cult Economics (a response)

David Calderwood writes today at LewRockwell.com about “cargo cults” and how the concept relates to today’s mainstream economics. I thought that he didn’t quite make the corelation and that the true parallel is much more ominous.

Thanks for your fantastic article, Mr. Calderwood. I would just like to add a clarification that would make the parallels between the New Guineans and today’s economists more apparent.
 
Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Nobel winning physicist, unintentional libertarian and great skeptic of government, used the term “cargo cult” do denote the reversal of cause and effect among the New Guineans after the US pulled out after WWII. During the war in the Pacific, the islanders had seen men in towers wearing headphones and talking into microphones (the cause) preceding cargo drops by B-36s (the effect). The New Guineans had become the beneficiary of some of this cargo and were sad to see that the great, silver birds were not coming back. In an effort to get another cargo drop, they imitated the conditions they thought attracted the planes in the first place. They built bamboo “towers,” wore headphones made from coconuts and shouted gibberish into palm-frond microphones. Needless to say, this didn’t work.
 
Little did they realize that they were mimicking the policies of FDR immediately preceding WWII. Roosevelt saw high employment, high wages and high productivity (and inflation) as the precursors, not the result, of prosperity (and great government revenues). When the Great Correction, er, Depression finally came, he looked to recreate the conditions he thought led to the largess of the previous decade which included work programs, artificially high wages and price supports. FDR had no more success than the hapless New Guineans would have years later.
 
Flash forward to today and we see that the economists on the government payroll are telling us we need more cargo cult solutions. They want to relabel “cause” and “effect” in an effort to mystically appease the gods who visited this great sorrow upon us (after all, it was nothing we did, right?).
 
So there is the obvious parallel. It’s even more scary than your article states. I’m reminded of a quote by another great physicist, Albert Einstein who defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.
 
Take care, my friend.
 
Joe Pulcinella
libertyguys.org

10
Dec

If Massive Government Spending Is So Important, Why Didn’t They Do It Sooner?

Katrina VanDenHuevel displays a popular ignorance of economics in this piece, in which she enthusiastically endorses Future President Obama’s proposal to create hundreds of billions of dollars out of nothing (in addition to the trillions in bailouts which US taxpayers have already been obligated to fund) for “infrastructure” spending (refer to our previous piece for the relevant definition).

Am I being petty when I ask why, if government spending on infrastructure is SO important, we haven’t done this before now? Even Ron Paul pointed out in the debates our crumbling roads and bridges as a higher use of the trillions being blown on wars abroad, for instance.

So why wasn’t this already done, particularly in the wake of such catastrophic infrastructure failures as the levies in New Orleans, and the I-34 bridge in Minneapolis? Do the billions of dollars lately wasted on the Big Dig, or being lavished on a tiny handful of residents of Manhattan’s East Side, 1, 2 qualify, and count toward some ideal level of infrastructure spending?  WTF is going on here?

I suspect that a big reason Bush and his co-conspirators “ignored” the need for an “adequate” level of infrastructure spending in this country in favor of invading the world relates to an old, old engineering joke;

Q: What’s the difference between mechanical engineers and civil engineers?

A: Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets.