Archive for July 16th, 2025

16
Jul

Setting Regular Republicans Straight About Liberty

Steven Greenhut, Orange County Register columnist and Friend of Liberty, wrote a column for Independence Day that was less than completely reverential toward our Gargantuan Imperial Military. Chip Hanlon, writing in Red County, took off after Greenhut, viciously smearing him, libertarians in general, and incredibly but oh-so-predictably Ron Paul.

Scores of commenters wrote back defending Greenhut, so my addition was probably piling on, but I really like it as a statement of Liberty;

Does Chip Even Read What He Writes?

What you write, repeatedly, is that libertarians (and by implication, incredibly, Ron Paul) are all kooks, because sometimes they make statements that are at odds with your well-entrenched beliefs. You even pull quotes out of context that seem to support your position, but you have made absolutely NO attempt to understand, much less attempt to honestly and intelligently refute them. Your debate techniques are the same ones used by all but one of the Republican candidates, including the eventual nominee.

You see where that has got us. Ron Paul told us all in the debates that if the Republican Party didn’t get serious about reversing the Bush welfare-warfare-torture- spying state, and cutting back on spending and empire, we were not only going down to defeat in November, but that the party would subsequently self-destruct. You don’t have to be crazy to see and understand that he was 100% right.

Look, I accept that not everyone is ready to keep peeling away at the onion of government. Over my political life’s journey, I have been at first shocked by many principled libertarian positions. Then, after mulling them over, I often come to see that in many instances (e.g., drug prohibition, gay marriage, pre-emptive war, central and fractional reserve banks, taxes, governmment spying), and putting aside my merely personal feelings, I have come to understand that the libertarian position logically and morally flows from the fundamental principle of freedom. The libertarian non-aggression axiom is the purest expression of the ideals, if not always the actions of the founders.

A standing military, particularly one as aggressive and imperial as ours, would absolutely shock and dismay many of them.  Steve Greenhut isn’t speaking a Republican heresy, he is simply stating his (in my view correct) opinion that the military establishment is out of political, strategic and financial control, and needs, not to be lauded for its unconstitutional size and scope, but rather reined in, hard. Any honest person, who takes a look at the trail of wreckage left behind by the US military over the past, well, century or two, has to see this.

What we need in this country is a return to the ideals of the founders, minus the bigotry. What we need is a DRASTICALLY smaller government.

What we need is Liberty.

16
Jul

Great Artwork, Bad Idea

My friend, Don, did this awesome art for a lengthy and biting City Paper article about Chester’s soccer stadium. He here at LG have been early adopters of criticism concerning it on every level and we’re glad to see others are starting to see it for what it is.

cover-1

 

The state legislature, though, resisted Rendell’s overtures, with some members arguing that building a soccer stadium with tax money was a bad investment. State Rep. Thaddeus Kirkland, who represents Chester, pointed out that Chester could use a grocery store more than it could a soccer stadium.

Around this time, the proposal changed. By September, The Team had begun to talk about the stadium as the mere "anchor" of a much larger project that would include retail, office and residential components — worth $300 million of investment in Chester. By January 2008, the project had grown more ambitious still: The investment figure had magically risen to $414 million, and The Team began dangling the ultimate prize: a supermarket.

The use of public money to build stadiums has become commonplace, despite evidence that taxpayers often don’t favor it, and despite a growing body of research by economists that says the stadiums are almost always — if not always — a bum deal.

At its core, we’re seeing Cargo Cult economics. Our Benevolent Overlords think that if they can make a Potemkin Village on a macro level with shiny buildings and enough bread and circuses, it will take root and magically become a viable community. Happy, obedient citizens will walk the streets (or take light rail) all hours of the day or night, stores will be full of shoppers swiping their plastic and dogs will cease to poop.

To you and I, this propped-up, subsidized economy is the definition of failure. However, to the ruling class, once the cardboard checks have been awarded and the booty divided amongst the unions, it is now time to don the flight suits and declare victory. Maybe they’re inhaling too much Viscose. Time to take the bars off the windows (if you are from around here, that last analogy would be really funny!).