Proposed List Of Demands For Occupy Wall St Movement!

\"\"\nA guy named Lloyd J. Hart proposes a list of DEMANDS the Occupy Wall St. protestors might make, assuming they succeed at, well, I'm not exactly sure what they are trying to accomplish, though I sympathize with the impulse. The demands are listed here. Iam going to take the bait and critique each demand;

\n

\nDemand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending \"Freetrade\" by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.

\n

This is actually two or three demands, as far as I can tell. The first demand, a high, protectionist tarriff, has an easy answer - Mr. Smoot, meet Mr. Hawley ( from the US State Department website); \"U.S. exports to Europe fell from $2,341 million in 1929 to $784 million in 1932. Overall, world trade declined by some 66% between 1929 and 1934.\" Also a $20 minimum wage, which will have the immediate effect of rendering everyone whose marginal revenue product is less than $20 unemployed and unemployable forever, or at least as long as it takes for the stupidity of said law to become grotesquely apparent.

\n

\nDemand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.

\n

Actually, the only effect medical insurance would have in a completely free market for medical care is that people who have uncertainty about the likelihood of future major medical medical expenses purchase inexpensive catastrophic coverage, and the provider of said coverage makes a profit. Otherwise, everyone else enjoys cheap, freely-available healthcare, unburdened by the awful AMA and FDA.

\n

\nDemand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.\n

\n

Extends demand 1A to people who cannot or will not produce a marginal revenue product at all. As if subsidizing unemployment has ever done anything but create more of it.

\n

\nDemand four: Free college education.

\n

Already done. You can get the very best college education imaginable completely free ,well, almost. You have to have a computer and an internet connection to access MIT's entire curriculum for free, on line. Beats the hell out of spending $250,000, and six years at a shitty state school, drinking beer and hooking up, doesn't it?

\n

\nDemand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.

\n

Already well underway. The rise in price of fossil fuels (when you tease out Fed inflation) is moving slowly and steadily upward. Or, at least it would be without massive government subsidies to fossil fuel industries such as pollution permits, tax policy, and direct military intervention. Nuclear power has an even worse government subsidy regime. And as for current alternative energy policies, they only serve to subsidize old tech, are economically dubious at best, or, as in the case of Solyndra, ethanol, and other boondoggles cross the line into criminality and fraud.

\n

\nDemand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.\n

\n

Again, mostly done. the Obama Stimulus spent, what, $750 billion on exactly that. And as you can see, all of our pressing infrastructure needs are completely resolved.

\n

\nDemand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America's nuclear power plants.\n

\n

7a) Give all federal lands back to nature and allow anyone to homestead them. 7b) End the TVA and BPA, here and all other monstrous Federal Dam authorities. 7c) End Price-Anderson, The Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and all state Public Utility Commissions, and make the contractors who built them and the companies that run them fully liable for any damage to persons or property.

\n

\nDemand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.\n

\n

8a) Done, see the 13th amendment. 8b) Tried that, almost passed until women realized what a raw deal it was for them.

\n

\nDemand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.\n

\n

Easy enough. End the Drug War and the Welfare state, or at least put a time threshold on collecting benefits, say 5 years. Then an open border would be welfare-neutral. Small side-effect though - immigrants will work you out of a job, kinda neutralizes Demand 1A.

\n

\nDemand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.\n

\n

Not sure how this helps, when there is no real choice in US elections, but OK, I'll give you that one.

\n

\nDemand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the \"Books.\" World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the \"Books.\" And I don't mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.

\n

11a) Forgiveness of sovereign debt - Well, finally a demand we wholeheartedly agree with! I didn't consent to any politician running up a debt, I damn sure don't want me, my children, or my great-great-great-great grandchildren held responsible to pay for Bush's and Obama's wars; 11b)Commercial loans already have a forgivenness provision, it's called BANKRUPTCY; 11c) Ditto for individuals; 11d) I told you you can get a college education for free, why the hell did you take out crushing loans?; 11e) See 11a); 11f) Are you sh!tting me? Letting the BANKS out of their obligations? They have already been bailed out tho the tune of $TRILLIONS. You sound like a corporatist! I assume this was an oversight.

\n

\nDemand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.\n

\n

Tough to do, we do have a thing called the First Amendment.

\n

\nDemand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.\n

\n

DONE. Any worker can sign any paper at any time now. Oh, you mean then that an employer has to recognize said paper as a legal binding obligation on him under penalty of law! Um, that's going to be difficult to do. There are a lot of unemployed people already who will not likely favor this idea once it becomes apparent that this will make unemployment worse.

\n

\nThese demands will create so many jobs it will be completely impossible to fill them without an open borders policy.\n

\n

A complete non-sequitur, but OK, let's see how it pans out.

\n

But come on, people, where is the radicalism? Where are the demands to End the Wars, End the Drug War, and End the Federal Reserve? Too busy grabbing socialist loot I guess.

\n

That's OK - Ron Paul has got you covered.

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5d0e4b0ea4e4445972d">

A guy named Lloyd J. Hart proposes a list of DEMANDS the Occupy Wall St. protestors might make, assuming they succeed at, well, I'm not exactly sure what they are trying to accomplish, though I sympathize with the impulse. The demands are listed here. Iam going to take the bait and critique each demand;

Demand one: Restoration of the living wage. This demand can only be met by ending "Freetrade" by re-imposing trade tariffs on all imported goods entering the American market to level the playing field for domestic family farming and domestic manufacturing as most nations that are dumping cheap products onto the American market have radical wage and environmental regulation advantages. Another policy that must be instituted is raise the minimum wage to twenty dollars an hr.

This is actually two or three demands, as far as I can tell. The first demand, a high, protectionist tarriff, has an easy answer - Mr. Smoot, meet Mr. Hawley ( from the US State Department website); "U.S. exports to Europe fell from $2,341 million in 1929 to $784 million in 1932. Overall, world trade declined by some 66% between 1929 and 1934." Also a $20 minimum wage, which will have the immediate effect of rendering everyone whose marginal revenue product is less than $20 unemployed and unemployable forever, or at least as long as it takes for the stupidity of said law to become grotesquely apparent.

Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.

Actually, the only effect medical insurance would have in a completely free market for medical care is that people who have uncertainty about the likelihood of future major medical medical expenses purchase inexpensive catastrophic coverage, and the provider of said coverage makes a profit. Otherwise, everyone else enjoys cheap, freely-available healthcare, unburdened by the awful AMA and FDA.

Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.

Extends demand 1A to people who cannot or will not produce a marginal revenue product at all. As if subsidizing unemployment has ever done anything but create more of it.

Demand four: Free college education.

Already done. You can get the very best college education imaginable completely free ,well, almost. You have to have a computer and an internet connection to access MIT's entire curriculum for free, on line. Beats the hell out of spending $250,000, and six years at a shitty state school, drinking beer and hooking up, doesn't it?

Demand five: Begin a fast track process to bring the fossil fuel economy to an end while at the same bringing the alternative energy economy up to energy demand.

Already well underway. The rise in price of fossil fuels (when you tease out Fed inflation) is moving slowly and steadily upward. Or, at least it would be without massive government subsidies to fossil fuel industries such as pollution permits, tax policy, and direct military intervention. Nuclear power has an even worse government subsidy regime. And as for current alternative energy policies, they only serve to subsidize old tech, are economically dubious at best, or, as in the case of Solyndra, ethanol, and other boondoggles cross the line into criminality and fraud.

Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.

Again, mostly done. the Obama Stimulus spent, what, $750 billion on exactly that. And as you can see, all of our pressing infrastructure needs are completely resolved.

Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America's nuclear power plants.

7a) Give all federal lands back to nature and allow anyone to homestead them. 7b) End the TVA and BPA, here and all other monstrous Federal Dam authorities. 7c) End Price-Anderson, The Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and all state Public Utility Commissions, and make the contractors who built them and the companies that run them fully liable for any damage to persons or property.

Demand eight: Racial and gender equal rights amendment.

8a) Done, see the 13th amendment. 8b) Tried that, almost passed until women realized what a raw deal it was for them.

Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.

Easy enough. End the Drug War and the Welfare state, or at least put a time threshold on collecting benefits, say 5 years. Then an open border would be welfare-neutral. Small side-effect though - immigrants will work you out of a job, kinda neutralizes Demand 1A.

Demand ten: Bring American elections up to international standards of a paper ballot precinct counted and recounted in front of an independent and party observers system.

Not sure how this helps, when there is no real choice in US elections, but OK, I'll give you that one.

Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the "Books." World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the "Books." And I don't mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.

11a) Forgiveness of sovereign debt - Well, finally a demand we wholeheartedly agree with! I didn't consent to any politician running up a debt, I damn sure don't want me, my children, or my great-great-great-great grandchildren held responsible to pay for Bush's and Obama's wars; 11b)Commercial loans already have a forgivenness provision, it's called BANKRUPTCY; 11c) Ditto for individuals; 11d) I told you you can get a college education for free, why the hell did you take out crushing loans?; 11e) See 11a); 11f) Are you sh!tting me? Letting the BANKS out of their obligations? They have already been bailed out tho the tune of $TRILLIONS. You sound like a corporatist! I assume this was an oversight.

Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.

Tough to do, we do have a thing called the First Amendment.

Demand thirteen: Allow all workers to sign a ballot at any time during a union organizing campaign or at any time that represents their yeah or nay to having a union represent them in collective bargaining or to form a union.

DONE. Any worker can sign any paper at any time now. Oh, you mean then that an employer has to recognize said paper as a legal binding obligation on him under penalty of law! Um, that's going to be difficult to do. There are a lot of unemployed people already who will not likely favor this idea once it becomes apparent that this will make unemployment worse.

These demands will create so many jobs it will be completely impossible to fill them without an open borders policy.

A complete non-sequitur, but OK, let's see how it pans out.

But come on, people, where is the radicalism? Where are the demands to End the Wars, End the Drug War, and End the Federal Reserve? Too busy grabbing socialist loot I guess.

That's OK - Ron Paul has got you covered.

Vote For School Expansion!

$25 MILLION School construction bond referendum tomorrow in East Greenwich and Swedesboro-Woolwich. Polls open 7am - 9pm. Don't forget to vote!\n[caption id=\"attachment_1306\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"300\" caption=\"Vote For GreA+ Schools! YES!\"]\"Vote[/caption]

\n

Also check out the detailed Q&A on the project, and the referenda.

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5cfe4b0ea4e4445971a">

$25 MILLION School construction bond referendum tomorrow in East Greenwich and Swedesboro-Woolwich. Polls open 7am - 9pm. Don't forget to vote! [caption id="attachment_1306" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Vote For GreA+ Schools! YES!"]Vote For GreA+ Schools! YES![/caption]

Also check out the detailed Q&A on the project, and the referenda.

When I Was Seven...

\u2026I would have traded my left eye for a bike this cool;\n\"\"

\n

LOOK at the friggin\u2019 MAG WHEELS, for one thing. HOLY SH!T!

\n

But if you go by the idiots that post reviews of stuff online, it\u2019s a cheap piece of crap;

\n

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20250806100208AAUILrE

\n

Is a 20\" Mongoose Rebel Freestyle Bike a good bmx bike?

\n

\u201CI was just wondering is this was a good bike because i have this bike and I want to start bmx. So yeah. And what are good brakes for this bike?\nPlease answer. Thanks \u201C

\n

\"Chipilinby Chipilin the pug

\n

Member since:

\n

July 09, 2025

\n

Total points:

\n

856 (Level 2)

\n

Best Answer -\u00A0Chosen\u00A0by Voters

\n

\u201Cnoo not good they suck if its from\u00A0walmart or any other dept store so no it sucks its to heavy. a goodBMX bike costs like 900 and up get a haro only buy the bike at\u00A0bike shops no where else\u201D

\n

\n

Apparently, according to these geniuses, you have to spend $300 - $800 (and definitely NOT $130 at Wal*Mart) to get an acceptable bike for a SEVEN YEAR OLD.

\n

SIGH.

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5cee4b0ea4e44459707">

…I would have traded my left eye for a bike this cool;

LOOK at the friggin’ MAG WHEELS, for one thing. HOLY SH!T!

But if you go by the idiots that post reviews of stuff online, it’s a cheap piece of crap;

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20250806100208AAUILrE

Is a 20" Mongoose Rebel Freestyle Bike a good bmx bike?

“I was just wondering is this was a good bike because i have this bike and I want to start bmx. So yeah. And what are good brakes for this bike? Please answer. Thanks “

Chipilin the pugby Chipilin the pug

Member since:

July 09, 2025

Total points:

856 (Level 2)

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

“noo not good they suck if its from walmart or any other dept store so no it sucks its to heavy. a goodBMX bike costs like 900 and up get a haro only buy the bike at bike shops no where else”

Apparently, according to these geniuses, you have to spend $300 - $800 (and definitely NOT $130 at Wal*Mart) to get an acceptable bike for a SEVEN YEAR OLD.

SIGH.

Coal -> Natural Gas -> Electricity = Pure Green Insanity

[caption id="attachment_1262" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Actual Photo of Coal-To-Gas-To-Electricity Technology"]Actual Photo of Coal-To-Gas-To-Electricity Technology[/caption] "Gov. Pat Quinn will sign controversial "clean coal" legislation Wednesday that paves the way for a new plant in Chicago that converts coal to natural gas, the Tribune has learned"

When is the approval coming for the plant that produces electricity by burning piles of thousand-dollar-bills? OH WAIT - ITS THE SAME PLANT

It would be hilarious, except that real people need the tax money more.

(PHOTO: NASA Global Warming Propaganda Pages)

Robert Higgs Has Had It With The 'Social Contract'

"I most emphatically do not hate America. I was not born in some foreign despotism, but in a domestic one known as Oklahoma, which I understand to be the very heart and soul of this country so far as culture and refinement are concerned. Moreover, for what it is worth, some of my ancestors had been living in North America for centuries before a handful of ragged, starving white men washed ashore on this continent, planted their flag, and claimed all the land they could see and a great deal they could not see on behalf of some sorry-ass European monarch. What chutzpah! I yield to no one in my affection for the Statue of Liberty, the Rocky Mountains, and the amber waves of grain, not to mention the celebrated jumping frog of Calaveras County. So when I am invited to get out of the country, I feel like someone living in a town taken over by the James Gang who has been told that if he doesn’t like being robbed and bullied by uninvited thugs, he should move to another town. To me, it seems much more fitting that the criminals get out." via Consent of the Governed? | The Beacon.

Uh Oh – Italy Is Coming Apart Like a 20-Dollar Suit

[caption id="attachment_1250" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Standing Around While Rome Burns"]Standing Around While Rome Burns[/caption] Last October I spent a week in Rome. The tax police (Guardia di Finanza) were EVERYWHERE, and NO ONE was paying any tax...and the Communists were decrying government "austerity" measures;

[caption id="attachment_1252" align="alignleft" width="225" caption="Italy Is Not Greece"]Italy Is Not Greece[/caption]

If it does turn out that Italy needs a bailout, it is going to change the entire game in Europe.

What is going on in Italy right now is potentially far more serious than what has been going on in Greece. Italy is the fourth largest economy in the European Union. If Italy requires a bailout, the rest of Europe might not be able to handle it.

An anonymous European Central Bank source told one German newspaper the following on Sunday....

"The existing rescue fund in Europe is not sufficient to provide a credible defensive wall for Italy"

The source also added that the current bailout fund "was never designed for that".

Uh Oh – Italy Is Coming Apart Like a 20-Dollar Suit.

Britain’s Conservatives Worry About Ties to Murdoch

GEE, do you think THIS has anything to do with why Citizen Rupert had "News of the World" euthanized? Sloppy, Rupert, sloppy;

LONDON — When David Cameron became prime minister in May 2010, one of his first visitors at 10 Downing Street — within 24 hours, and entering by a back door, according to accounts in British newspapers — was Rupert Murdoch.

Fourteen months later, with Mr. Murdoch’s media empire in Britain reeling, Mr. Cameron may feel that his close relationship with Mr. Murdoch, which included a range of social contacts with members of the Murdoch family and the tycoon’s senior executives, has been a costly overreach.

Those concerns will be intensified by the expected arrest on Friday of Andy Coulson, the former editor of The News of the World and, until he resigned in January this year, Mr. Cameron’s media chief at Downing Street.

Mr. Cameron hired Mr. Coulson in 2007 after scandals had rocked the newspaper. And he repeatedly defended him even as signs accumulated that Mr. Coulson had greater awareness of the newspaper’s phone-hacking practices than he had acknowledged.

Some of Mr. Cameron’s political opponents have cast the embrace of Mr. Murdoch as a mistake that could combine with other recent miscues by the Cameron government to seriously weaken the prime minister’s party, the Conservatives.

via Britain’s Conservatives Worry About Ties to Murdoch - NYTimes.com.

Some Truth In Advertising for the PLCB

[caption id=\"attachment_1207\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"528\" caption=\"There, I Fixed It\"]\"There,[/caption]\nOn vacation this week in my former home state of Pennsylvania, I passed a billboard on I-95 south at 322 (undoubtedly paid for by the taxpayers of said state) touting the \"Chairman's Selection\" by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. It slickly presented typical bucolic wine-business images of grapes, vines, barrels, etc, all to give the casual viewer the idea that a state wine monopoly is just great, look, we even have special selections of wines by our Chairman. I am sure this was by the merest coincidence a mile or three from the massive privately-owned wine store just across the border in Delaware, a state whose residents presumably live their lives bereft of the wonderful wine selections made by the chairman of their neighboring state's liquor monopoly.

\n

I couldn't find the billboard online (Joe?) but in the spirit of trying to help all those folksy bureaucrats in Harrisburg to successfully put across their message, I corrected the PALCB's \"Chairman's Selection\" logo. You're welcome!

\n

Here's one someone did earlier;\n[caption id=\"attachment_1209\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"300\" caption=\"Wine Revolution For The People\"]\"Wine[/caption]

\n

(PHOTOS: PLCB, wikipedia, me, Empty Bottles)

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5c6e4b0ea4e4445967b">

[caption id="attachment_1207" align="aligncenter" width="528" caption="There, I Fixed It"]There, I Fixed It[/caption] On vacation this week in my former home state of Pennsylvania, I passed a billboard on I-95 south at 322 (undoubtedly paid for by the taxpayers of said state) touting the "Chairman's Selection" by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. It slickly presented typical bucolic wine-business images of grapes, vines, barrels, etc, all to give the casual viewer the idea that a state wine monopoly is just great, look, we even have special selections of wines by our Chairman. I am sure this was by the merest coincidence a mile or three from the massive privately-owned wine store just across the border in Delaware, a state whose residents presumably live their lives bereft of the wonderful wine selections made by the chairman of their neighboring state's liquor monopoly.

I couldn't find the billboard online (Joe?) but in the spirit of trying to help all those folksy bureaucrats in Harrisburg to successfully put across their message, I corrected the PALCB's "Chairman's Selection" logo. You're welcome!

Here's one someone did earlier; [caption id="attachment_1209" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Wine Revolution For The People"]Wine Revolution![/caption]

(PHOTOS: PLCB, wikipedia, me, Empty Bottles)

Let's Build A Tyranny On The Backs Of The Homeless

[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"600\" caption=\"Food For Votes, or a Prank?\"]\"Food[/caption]\nI was in Portland OR recently, and noticed a goodly number of homeless people / panhandlers as you do in smaller and Southern cities these days, the bigger ones having run them all off.

\n

So I was interested (but not surprised) to read of Portland's city fathers (and mothers) taking state and federally-stolen tax dollars to build a palatial, $50-odd-million complex to \"serve\" them;

\n

\"Straddling Portland\u2019s Chinatown and the Pearl District, a neighborhood of reclaimed warehouse spaces, the eight-story Homeless Service Center cost $46.9 million in city, county and federal stimulus funds to construct. It will contain 130 studio apartment-style permanent residences, 90 shelter beds, and offices for 50 staff members. Complimentary GED classes, haircuts and art therapy will be on offer.

\n

\u2026It\u2019s a noble mission. The trouble is there are no time limits for those living in the center\u2019s studio apartment units. The job training, GED courses and writing classes that the center will offer will be entirely optional. The center\u2019s taxpayer-funded yoga sessions and nutrition classes, meanwhile, will be available to anybody who shows up.\"

\n

Yep, definitely no subsidization of social pathology going on THERE, for votes.

\n

In the same week, the august leaders of Orlando, FL highlight a different lovely aspect of statism; jailing people who on their own (and not through a multimillion-dollar contract) are attempting to actually help homeless people directly, as if the helpers were feeding pigeons;

\n

\"On May 25, Orlando Food Not Bombs illegally fed a large group of homeless people, the police report states. The group on its website called for members to show up that day and defy the city ordinance, according to the report. \"They basically carted them off to jail for feeding hungry people,\" said Coleman, who was not present. \"For them to regulate a time and place for free speech and to share food, that is unacceptable.\"

\n

And why not? After all, didn't Jesus say you can only feed the hungry when Caesar's minions decreed it allowable? Didn't Thomas Jefferson say \"Give me liberty, but only between two and five on alternate Wednesdays, Fridays, and Sundays? No?

\n

Statists, it turns out, don't seem to know what to do about the homeless; to use them to buy (with your money) certain votes by coddling them, or to buy others (also with your money) by crushing them.

\n

All you really need to know is that they know the homeless are not human, and are thus vote fodder.

\n

It seems, in the 21st century, \"Love thy neighbor\" no longer meets the bare minimum required by law.

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5c5e4b0ea4e44459648">

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="Food For Votes, or a Prank?"]Food For Votes[/caption] I was in Portland OR recently, and noticed a goodly number of homeless people / panhandlers as you do in smaller and Southern cities these days, the bigger ones having run them all off.

So I was interested (but not surprised) to read of Portland's city fathers (and mothers) taking state and federally-stolen tax dollars to build a palatial, $50-odd-million complex to "serve" them;

"Straddling Portland’s Chinatown and the Pearl District, a neighborhood of reclaimed warehouse spaces, the eight-story Homeless Service Center cost $46.9 million in city, county and federal stimulus funds to construct. It will contain 130 studio apartment-style permanent residences, 90 shelter beds, and offices for 50 staff members. Complimentary GED classes, haircuts and art therapy will be on offer.

…It’s a noble mission. The trouble is there are no time limits for those living in the center’s studio apartment units. The job training, GED courses and writing classes that the center will offer will be entirely optional. The center’s taxpayer-funded yoga sessions and nutrition classes, meanwhile, will be available to anybody who shows up."

Yep, definitely no subsidization of social pathology going on THERE, for votes.

In the same week, the august leaders of Orlando, FL highlight a different lovely aspect of statism; jailing people who on their own (and not through a multimillion-dollar contract) are attempting to actually help homeless people directly, as if the helpers were feeding pigeons;

"On May 25, Orlando Food Not Bombs illegally fed a large group of homeless people, the police report states. The group on its website called for members to show up that day and defy the city ordinance, according to the report. "They basically carted them off to jail for feeding hungry people," said Coleman, who was not present. "For them to regulate a time and place for free speech and to share food, that is unacceptable."

And why not? After all, didn't Jesus say you can only feed the hungry when Caesar's minions decreed it allowable? Didn't Thomas Jefferson say "Give me liberty, but only between two and five on alternate Wednesdays, Fridays, and Sundays? No?

Statists, it turns out, don't seem to know what to do about the homeless; to use them to buy (with your money) certain votes by coddling them, or to buy others (also with your money) by crushing them.

All you really need to know is that they know the homeless are not human, and are thus vote fodder.

It seems, in the 21st century, "Love thy neighbor" no longer meets the bare minimum required by law.

None Dare Call It Conspiracy...

...so call it \"harmony of interests\". As much as liberals love to rag on George W. Bush's intelligence (or lack therof, and I do too), no national government since the Civil War has failed to be chock-full of brilliant, talented people.\nOne of them, Condie Rice (I know, compliant and corrupt, but not dumb) put, on August 6, 2001, a Presidential Daily Briefing ON THE PRESIDENT'S DESK, that was headlined \"Bin Laden Determined To Attack US\".

\n

Maybe you think GW spilled his Count Chocula on it or something, but I will bet any amount that Dick Cheney was at least aware of it. So how does one handle such cognitive dissonance? How does one believe in the evil that these people committed before our very eyes, and still believe that on 9/11, they were just a bunch of clueless schmucks? It does not compute.

\n

Pay attention to the hearings in the UK parliament - our leaders, to be undeservedly kind were extremely careful with the truth on Iraq. What else is there?

\n

For an excellent expose on the difference between conspiracy theories on one hand, and \"harmony of interests\" on the other, listen to Murray Rothbard's presentation on the Fed and the power elite;

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5bee4b0ea4e444595a6">

...so call it "harmony of interests". As much as liberals love to rag on George W. Bush's intelligence (or lack therof, and I do too), no national government since the Civil War has failed to be chock-full of brilliant, talented people. One of them, Condie Rice (I know, compliant and corrupt, but not dumb) put, on August 6, 2001, a Presidential Daily Briefing ON THE PRESIDENT'S DESK, that was headlined "Bin Laden Determined To Attack US".

Maybe you think GW spilled his Count Chocula on it or something, but I will bet any amount that Dick Cheney was at least aware of it. So how does one handle such cognitive dissonance? How does one believe in the evil that these people committed before our very eyes, and still believe that on 9/11, they were just a bunch of clueless schmucks? It does not compute.

Pay attention to the hearings in the UK parliament - our leaders, to be undeservedly kind were extremely careful with the truth on Iraq. What else is there?

For an excellent expose on the difference between conspiracy theories on one hand, and "harmony of interests" on the other, listen to Murray Rothbard's presentation on the Fed and the power elite;

Volt Fraud At Government Motors

HAHAHAHAHA, this is TOO funny; "The Chevy Volt, hailed by the Obama administration as the electric savior of the auto industry and the planet, makes its debut in showrooms next month, but its already being rolled out for test drives by journalists. It appears were all being taken for a ride."

via Volt Fraud At Government Motors - Investors.com.

Moloch's Holy Ground

I LOVE THIS.\n\"\"

\n

Stephen Budiansky's Liberal Curmudgeon Blog: Steve's guide to Ground Zero.

\n

Also see Ron Paul.

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5b6e4b0ea4e44459507">

When Is Charity Not Charitable?

[caption id=\"attachment_968\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"837\" caption=\"Full of Something\"]\"Full[/caption]\n

\"The Giving Pledge is the brainchild of billionaire businessmen\u00A0Bill Gates and\u00A0Warren Buffett. The two of them have teamed up to ask the world's wealthiest people to donate at least 50% of their fortunes to charities. They believe that the richest people in the world can eradicate many of the world's problems through philanthropy. The pledge is not a binding contract but more of a \"moral commitment\". Individuals are free to donate money to whatever cause they would like. So, far about 40 billionaires have accepted the giving pledge challenge. That's not a large number when you consider that there are nearly 1,000 billionaires in the world, according to\u00A0Forbes. So, who hasn't signed up and for what reason? \"

\n

Gates and Buffett will not give away ONE DIME.

\n

Instead, they will put all of their billions into foundations they and their heirs control, to lobby for things THEY believe in, at everyone else's expense.

\n

Also, they are both HUGE proponents of letting the estate-tax cut expire, because then, when small businessmen die, their heirs will have to sell their companies, at a huge discount, to pay the estate tax.

\n

And who will buy these companies at a huge discount?

\n

Uh-huh, people like Buffett and Gates.\u00A0Screw them.

\n

Also, it is turning the concept of (Christian) charity on its head - proclaim your \"giving\" as loudly and ostentatiously as you can, and bullyrag others to do do likewise;

\n

\"Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Matt 6:5,Matt 6:16,Matt 23:5

\n

Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. Luke 6:24

\n

But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly. Jer 17:10, Matt 6:6, Matt 6:18\"

\n

(Thanks to my wife for bringing this to my attention)

\n

Billionaires Who Havent Taken The Pledge.

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5b6e4b0ea4e444594f1">

[caption id="attachment_968" align="aligncenter" width="837" caption="Full of Something"]Full of Something[/caption]

"The Giving Pledge is the brainchild of billionaire businessmen Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. The two of them have teamed up to ask the world's wealthiest people to donate at least 50% of their fortunes to charities. They believe that the richest people in the world can eradicate many of the world's problems through philanthropy. The pledge is not a binding contract but more of a "moral commitment". Individuals are free to donate money to whatever cause they would like. So, far about 40 billionaires have accepted the giving pledge challenge. That's not a large number when you consider that there are nearly 1,000 billionaires in the world, according to Forbes. So, who hasn't signed up and for what reason? "

Gates and Buffett will not give away ONE DIME.

Instead, they will put all of their billions into foundations they and their heirs control, to lobby for things THEY believe in, at everyone else's expense.

Also, they are both HUGE proponents of letting the estate-tax cut expire, because then, when small businessmen die, their heirs will have to sell their companies, at a huge discount, to pay the estate tax.

And who will buy these companies at a huge discount?

Uh-huh, people like Buffett and Gates. Screw them.

Also, it is turning the concept of (Christian) charity on its head - proclaim your "giving" as loudly and ostentatiously as you can, and bullyrag others to do do likewise;

"Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Matt 6:5,Matt 6:16,Matt 23:5

Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. Luke 6:24

But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly. Jer 17:10, Matt 6:6, Matt 6:18"

(Thanks to my wife for bringing this to my attention)

Billionaires Who Havent Taken The Pledge.

Of Allah, and Moloch

[caption id=\"attachment_960\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"598\" caption=\"Not The Only Bull-God Here\"]\"Not[/caption]Isn't there a rule against putting one church (the Muslim mosque) on the grounds of another (the Nationalist \"Ground Zero\")? Seriously, when do \"we\", meaning the public, let this ridiculous miasma of a grotesque nationalist mausoleum go, and let the people who live and work in this long-stricken area get their property rights and their lives back? Do our elites really plan to reserve their hideous 'holy ground' for a temple to Moloch, alone?

\n

BTW, another of the Horsemen of the Apocalypse has arrived - the NJACLU is lauding NJ governor Chris Christie for defending Cordoba House (mass e-mailing, not that they could be bothered to post it on their site or anything).

\n

And never mind that the area also contains restaurants, bars, offices, hotels, , Christian churches, and several, er, OTHER businesses.

\n

Manhattan has been suffering from this statist deformity since way before 9/11/2001. I can't find the contemporary (New Yorker?) article, but Wikipedia also mentions that acres of property were stolen, and a hundred residents evicted to make way for Nelson Rockefeller's monstrous, diplopic, evidently flammable penis extension back in 1964;

\n

I don't need to remind you that this entire controversy is a classic PR-lying campaign, and that to the extent that ordinary America even knows about what is being proposed, it is through the distorted lens of said PR-lying campaign. Previously, the average American would either have had no opinion, or have just assumed that, it being NYC, a half-dozen mosques already existed in the area. Now, that most dangerous and muddle-headed species, Boobus Americanus, has had its consciousness 'raised' by its 'betters'.

\n

At any rate, the fact that 10 years later there is still relatively zero rebuilding progress is a sad testimony to the weakness of the elites, as is this pathetic 'controversy'. Thank God.

\n

(PHOTO: www.moloch.us)

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5b4e4b0ea4e444594df">

[caption id="attachment_960" align="aligncenter" width="598" caption="Not The Only Bull-God Here"]Not The Only Bull-God Here[/caption]Isn't there a rule against putting one church (the Muslim mosque) on the grounds of another (the Nationalist "Ground Zero")? Seriously, when do "we", meaning the public, let this ridiculous miasma of a grotesque nationalist mausoleum go, and let the people who live and work in this long-stricken area get their property rights and their lives back? Do our elites really plan to reserve their hideous 'holy ground' for a temple to Moloch, alone?

BTW, another of the Horsemen of the Apocalypse has arrived - the NJACLU is lauding NJ governor Chris Christie for defending Cordoba House (mass e-mailing, not that they could be bothered to post it on their site or anything).

And never mind that the area also contains restaurants, bars, offices, hotels, , Christian churches, and several, er, OTHER businesses.

Manhattan has been suffering from this statist deformity since way before 9/11/2001. I can't find the contemporary (New Yorker?) article, but Wikipedia also mentions that acres of property were stolen, and a hundred residents evicted to make way for Nelson Rockefeller's monstrous, diplopic, evidently flammable penis extension back in 1964;

I don't need to remind you that this entire controversy is a classic PR-lying campaign, and that to the extent that ordinary America even knows about what is being proposed, it is through the distorted lens of said PR-lying campaign. Previously, the average American would either have had no opinion, or have just assumed that, it being NYC, a half-dozen mosques already existed in the area. Now, that most dangerous and muddle-headed species, Boobus Americanus, has had its consciousness 'raised' by its 'betters'.

At any rate, the fact that 10 years later there is still relatively zero rebuilding progress is a sad testimony to the weakness of the elites, as is this pathetic 'controversy'. Thank God.

(PHOTO: www.moloch.us)

When The Emperor Moves, Part XX

I suffered though INNUMERABLE such visits the Clintons made to wealthy sycophants in NY throughout their 8 years in office, as I spent most of that time working in the NY metro area. A small measure of relief occurred under Bush, who preferred to raise bribes for henchmen in the south and west, though occasionally still pausing to threaten lives and property in my home community. Apparently, Los Angelenos are finding out it is their turn to suffer for the convenience of Obama and his unindicted co-conspirators; "President Obamas fundraising mission in Los Angeles on Monday evening may have been a whirlwind trip for him, but it was a tedious slog for the thousands who found themselves in gridlock from the Westside to downtown.

A Brentwood residents two-mile jaunt took 45 minutes. An Echo Park couple who left home at 5:30 p.m. found their usual 20-minute drive west to Olympic and Rimpau boulevards took a whopping hour and 15 minutes. An attorney left his Miracle Mile-area office at 5:45 p.m. and sat unmoving in traffic for 45 minutes.

No matter their politics, Los Angeles residents found themselves united. "It was a beautiful thing," said Brentwood resident Myles Berkowitz, commiserating with his neighbors on Montana Avenue. "Young, old, black, white — everyone was pissed off.""

via Traffic: Its unanimous, presidents visit leaves L.A. boiling - latimes.com.

Psychopathy Legitimized by Fred Reed

Today, on LRC, Fred Reed ticks almost all the boxes (categories) with this one; "Perhaps the US should recognize that it has a second-rate military at phenomenal cost – an enormous, largely useless national codpiece. It is embarrassing. The Pentagon’s preferred enemies are lightly armed, poorly equipped peasants, which makes for a long war and thus hundreds of billions of dollars in juicy contracts for military industries. Yet the greatest military in history (ask it) gets run out of Southeast Asia, blown up and run out of Lebanon, shot down and run out of Somalia, with Afghanistan a disaster in progress and Iraq claimed as an American victory rather than Shiite. Do the aircraft carriers intimidate North Korea? No. Iran? No. China? No. For this, a trillion dollars a year?"

via Psychopathy Legitimized by Fred Reed.

Economics IS Hard. Especially If You Lack Self-Awareness

[caption id=\"attachment_893\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"108\" caption=\"This guy thinks we are stupid jerks. Big surprise - he works for the Fed. \"]\"This[/caption]This is rich. Tyler Durden via lewrockwell.com points us to a rambling, anti-blogger rant from some faceless Fed functionary about how people without PhDs in economics should just shut the hell up and allow our betters to make everything all better by a heavy application of Keynsian theory (Durden's commentary is priceless, and you MUST read the comments).

\n

Well, forgive me if I am being impolite to even mention it, but the esteemed Lord Keynes, did he have a PhD in economics? Why, no, he did not. Did he have a PhD in anything? Why, no, he did not. Well surely he MUST have had an undergraduate degree in economics, at very least. Well, uh, also no, his Bachelor's degree was in mathematics. Which tells you all you need to know about Lord Keynes' facility with classical economics, e.g., virtually none.

\n

Meanwhile, the leading figures in the late classical economics movement, Austrians Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, along with Murray Rothbard, Hans Hoppe, Joe Salerno, and a cadre of others, who propound a body of economics colloquially called the Austrian School, are being proved right again and again (as we repeatedly have pointed out) , as stimulus after massive stimulus (as propounded by lackeys like Kartik Athreya) fails to revive the corpse of the Keynsian economy of the past century.

\n

Oh, and all of the major Austrian School scholars had PhDs.

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb5aae4b0ea4e4445941d">

[caption id="attachment_893" align="aligncenter" width="108" caption="This guy thinks we are stupid jerks. Big surprise - he works for the Fed. "]This guy thinks we are stupid jerks. Big surprise - he works for the Fed. [/caption]This is rich. Tyler Durden via lewrockwell.com points us to a rambling, anti-blogger rant from some faceless Fed functionary about how people without PhDs in economics should just shut the hell up and allow our betters to make everything all better by a heavy application of Keynsian theory (Durden's commentary is priceless, and you MUST read the comments).

Well, forgive me if I am being impolite to even mention it, but the esteemed Lord Keynes, did he have a PhD in economics? Why, no, he did not. Did he have a PhD in anything? Why, no, he did not. Well surely he MUST have had an undergraduate degree in economics, at very least. Well, uh, also no, his Bachelor's degree was in mathematics. Which tells you all you need to know about Lord Keynes' facility with classical economics, e.g., virtually none.

Meanwhile, the leading figures in the late classical economics movement, Austrians Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, along with Murray Rothbard, Hans Hoppe, Joe Salerno, and a cadre of others, who propound a body of economics colloquially called the Austrian School, are being proved right again and again (as we repeatedly have pointed out) , as stimulus after massive stimulus (as propounded by lackeys like Kartik Athreya) fails to revive the corpse of the Keynsian economy of the past century.

Oh, and all of the major Austrian School scholars had PhDs.

This is What "Compromise" on Healthcare Reform Means

Candidate Obama On Single- Payer Healthcare\n\"House Democrats overcame their own divisions and broke an impasse that threatened the bill after liberals grudgingly accepted tougher restrictions on abortion funding, as abortion opponents demanded.\"

\n

AH, this explains the french-kissing I heard from the pulpit this past Sunday.

\n

\"In (sic - the) Senate, the stumbling block is the idea of the government competing with private insurers. Liberals may have to swallow hard and accept a deal without a public plan in order to keep the legislation alive. As in the House, the compromise appears to be to the right of the political spectrum.\"

\n

To my principled liberal friends - how's that 'single-payer' thing going?

\n

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpAyan1fXCE

","wysiwyg":{"engine":"code","isSource":false,"mode":"htmlmixed","source":""}}" data-block-type="2" id="block-507cb59ee4b0ea4e4445936c">

Candidate Obama On Single- Payer Healthcare "House Democrats overcame their own divisions and broke an impasse that threatened the bill after liberals grudgingly accepted tougher restrictions on abortion funding, as abortion opponents demanded."

AH, this explains the french-kissing I heard from the pulpit this past Sunday.

"In (sic - the) Senate, the stumbling block is the idea of the government competing with private insurers. Liberals may have to swallow hard and accept a deal without a public plan in order to keep the legislation alive. As in the House, the compromise appears to be to the right of the political spectrum."

To my principled liberal friends - how's that 'single-payer' thing going?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpAyan1fXCE