They May Be Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, But We Love Them Anyway!

by Vince?Daliessio

(PHOTO: Private Jet or Welfare Cadillac?)

The "Emo Marxists" at BoingBoing (we LOVE BoingBoing!) purvey so much art and tech goodness that we can usually overlook their often-breathtaking economic ignorance and somewhat charming political naivete (note to Cory - the Fourth Amendment applies ONLY to the federal government, NOT to Disney, which has a fundamental right to put any condition whatever on your setting foot on its property).

But sometimes they are right on;

The aviation fees that can account for 25 percent of your airfares are being diverted to upgrade private airports used by corporate and private jets:

"They're making out like bandits," said Bob Poole, director of transportation studies at Southern California's Reason Foundation and author of several studies on air transportation costs. "It's not only that airline passengers are paying more than their fair share, but they're being overtaxed to give private jets a free ride."...

??? ?• J.T. Wilson Field in Somerset, Ky. got more than $12 million since 2001, much of it through the influence of local Rep. Hal Rogers, a longtime Republican member of the House Appropriations Committee who uses the airfield for trips home. Wilson Field is home base to 26 small planes and one jet. Despite millions in improvements, including a passenger terminal, the airport has yet to see scheduled commercial service...

??? ?• California's Napa Valley Airport collected $6.3 million in taxpayer dollars over the past two years, even though it mainly serves private jets and small planes in addition to being a pilot training base for Japan Air Lines.

??? ?• Sardy Field, in the ultra-rich mountain playground of Aspen, Colo., has received $27.2 million in funding since 2005. While Aspen does offer service by major airlines, private jets and other general aviation aircraft make up the majority of its traffic, airport officials said.

In this case, it's the readers who take up the socialist cause;

Update: Mike takes exception to this characterization of the disbursement of aviation taxes:

??? With few exceptions, every commercial pilot in the U.S. learned to fly, or at least built up the majority of his or her flight time, at small general-aviation airports. It currently costs at least $8,000 for an individual to get his or her private pilot license, and believe it or not that's actually inexpensive compared to what it would cost if the airlines had their way on the user fee issue. If it cost a student pilot $120 just to take off from his or her local airport, and $60 to land again, then the cost of a private pilot license would balloon to probably $30,000 and general aviation would cease to exist. The only airplanes in the sky would be either those of the ultra-rich who don't care what you charge, or giant behemoths that can amortize that $180 across each of their hundreds of passengers.

??? It's easy to point out that corporate jets land at small airports, and therefore that the rich people inside those jets are benefiting from tax dollars. But rich people drive on highways, too, and you're surely not advocating that each road in the U.S. become a toll road. That would be a regressive tax that hurts exactly the wrong people.

Uh, actually privatizing roads wouldn't necessarily make all roads into toll roads, and many moderate income people would realize revenue if they gained ownership of the roads adjoining their properties, but I digress. Airport fees reflect the monopoly status of airports, not some imaginary "free market".

Update 2: Craig sez,

??? If someone needs in or out of a community for medical reasons, often some little airport there is the only way.

??? Organ transport only works in small aircraft, unless the organs you need happen to be in the major city you?re doing the medical work in.

??? On a lesser significant but more personal note, I have flown into a number of small way-out-of-the-way airports to transport people ? friends, or friends of friends ? who needed to get to Seattle to be with loved ones who are in hospital. People who couldn?t get enough time off from employers to make the drive to and from the city.

Hey Craig, way to advocate socialism in the name of; 1)people deciding to live in the boonies; 2) People who need socialist medical procedures while living in the boonies, and; 3) people whose eeevil employers won't let them drive to visit Grandma in the boonies.

Just stop it. Stop ALL tax funding of ALL forms of transport, and there will no longer be an argument - rich people and poor alike will all carry their own transportation weight.

?

Comments

See how simple that was to solve?

Post a Repsonse

Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code?Load New Code
Powered by Web Wiz CAPTCHA version 2.01
Copyright ?2005-2006 Web Wiz Guide