The Nonsense Tax Debate

by Vince?Daliessio

John Kerry has made rescinding the Bush tax cuts for families making salaries over $200,000 a centerpiece of his campaign. Class envy isn't an especially noble trait to display, but ok, fine. Demonize two-income professional families if you want to.?Joe the engineer and?his?attorney wife lose their tax cut, woo hoo! The emptiness of the rhetoric, however, is really apparent when you read this article?in Newsday, and see how many corporate executives receive the bulk of their compensation in perks, stock, and options, taxed not at 35% (or, under Kerry's revocation 39.6%), but (when they vest) as long-term capital gains at 15%.?For example, check out Harvey Blau, chairman and CEO of Griffon - $5m in salary, true, but options potentially worth $25 million. That means under Kerry's plan?he would?have paid 39.6% on his first $5 million, unless he hit the AMT, poor baby. But on the next $25 million (or more), he would stilll be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate of 15%. How would you like to be able to do that with YOUR salary?

Comments

More to the point, ME AND MY WIFE are potential victims of the Kerry tax "uncut".We are far from wealthy (in fact we used our good fortune this year to dig out of a large financial hole), and are going to have to scrape together funds to pay the taxes as it is. We will also probably run smack into the AMT this year. So when Kerry (and McGreevy) says he's going to take back tax cuts from the "rich" he's aiming his sights right at me, and let me tell you something buddy, I'm PISSED!

The adage that "the wealthiest 5% of people pay 95% of all taxes" is only partially true. It may be more accurate that the the"between 2% and 5%" portion pays the freight. The top 1% are usually entreprenuers and have income options other than salary.

Post a Repsonse

Name:
Comment:
?

?